stuartmaclennan.co.uk Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the stuartmaclennan.co.uk

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host stuartmaclennan.co.uk. Currently, hosted in United Kingdom and its service provider is Wildcard UK Limited .

the related websites

postonline.co.uk uk.virginmoneygiving.com news.bbc.co.uk companycheck.co.uk beta.companieshouse.gov.uk netmums.com checkdirector.co.uk dailymail.co.uk mcclellandcars.co.uk arthurllewellynjenkins.co.uk bbc.co.uk ramsdale.org independent.co.uk royal-mile.com arthurbell.co.uk atseuromaster.co.uk 

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called nginx containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

sensiblestu literally world famous honesty june 13, 2018 brexit and devolution: a quick primer dr. stuart maclennan europe , scottish politics , the constitution , uk politics #brexit , ian blackford , nicola sturgeon , snp 0 comments these guys look really pissed last night’s brexit votes and today’s parliamentary shenanigans have certainly drawn attention to legislative amendments in a way that, quite frankly, i have never seen. naturally, the scottish national party want to be seen to be “standing up for scotland” (they have to be seen to be doing something, i suppose), but beyond the sphere of a handful of hardened politicos and legal academics, i suspect that there is little appreciation, if any, of what was actually at the core of this debate. for my first blog in quite a while (i’ve been trying to devote my time to that thing i actually get paid for), i thought, therefore, that i would write a quick primer in order to cut through some of the rhetoric. what is clause 11? at present, the scottish parliament may not legislate in a way that is incompatible with european union (eu) law. clause 11 of the european union withdrawal bill transposes that prohibition to what will, after we leave the eu, be known as “retained eu law.” the effect of this, as introduced, was the prevention of any competences whatsoever transferring from brussels to holyrood. this was the principal reason for snp, labour, green, and lib dem msps voting to withhold legislative consent for the withdrawal bill in holyrood. what did the lords’ amendment do? the house of lords made a number of amendments to the withdrawal bill. one such amendment, amendment 26, vastly improved clause 11 of the withdrawal bill. the amendment removed the blanket prohibition on legislating for retained eu law, and replaced it with a clause that was more limited in scope, and would be time limited to a period of two years for uk ministers to make rules in these areas, and those rules could not have any legal effect after five years. after this period, all eu competences that would otherwise have fallen within the scope of the competences of the scottish parliament will transfer automatically to holyrood. the tories voted for this amendment; not being perfect, but being better than the old clause 11, labour and the lib dems abstained; the snp voted against. why did the snp vote against amending clause 11? quite simply, i have no idea. voting against an amendment doesn’t remove the clause from the bill, it simply leaves the bill unamended, meaning the bill progresses with the original version of clause 11 which the snp, apparently, so vehemently opposed. by voting against the lords’ amendment the snp actually voted for the total power grab they purport to oppose. but the snp stood up for devolution today, didn’t they? quite simply, no. through today’s pre-planned stunt (pete wishart has all-but admitted it was planned) ian blackford rendered himself ineligible to vote on today’s crucial amendments, including on continued membership of the single market. snp mps had questions on the order paper for pmqs which they were unable to ask as they flounced out of the chamber. furthermore, having secured a motion to have an emergency debate on devolution (which the speaker was willing to grant), their walkout meant that there was no one from the snp to make that application and it was too late for another mp to do so. the snp’s walkout meant that there was no chance for a debate on brexit’s impact on devolution. while i love a bit of parliamentary theatre (and john bercow is certainly wrong when he says the public don’t enjoy it), it becomes difficult to justify when it has a material effect on your ability to scrutinise one of the most important pieces of legislation to proceed through parliament in over 40 years. furthermore, while nicola sturgeon, naturally, has to go along with today’s tomfoolery, it is difficult to imagine a politician who has spent 30 years helping to mould the snp into a credible party of government approving a stunt that is more befitting of a student union meeting. june 11, 2017 the road ahead for sturgeon is fraught with danger dr. stuart maclennan scottish politics #ge17 , #sp21 , conservatives , jeremy corbyn , labour , nicola sturgeon , snp 1 comment for the second year in a row the prize for most spectacular self-inflicted political wound must surely go to the prime minister of the day. despite having piled on support for the conservative party, mrs. may severely underestimated her opponent (as, i am happy to admit, did i), who piled on more votes and so deprived the prime minister of her majority, and her authority. however, mrs. may is not the only politician who until recently was walking on water to have had a disastrous night on thursday. in relative terms the biggest vote loser was the snp, as well as the biggest seat loser in absolute terms. while it is certainly true that the snp’s starting point was astonishingly high, in only two seats did the snp start with a majority of less than 3,000. the average snp majority was 9,966. save for a handful of seats the snp’s grip on scotland looked solid for a generation. while the expectation for thursday’s election was that labour would be squeezed from both sides; it was the snp, in fact, who lost votes to both left and right. after thursday’s mauling, the snp have been deprived of 21 seats. in angus, and coatbridge, the conservatives and labour, respectively, overturned snp majorities in excess of 11,000. the snp’s overall vote share declined by more than 13 percentage points, with the conservatives, in particular, but also labour, adding hefty chunks of the vote to their respective piles. the average majority in snp-held seats now stands at a mere 2,292. the snp’s impressive coalition of support in 2015 can broadly be broken down into three categories. the first is voters who aren’t nationalists, but voted snp either because they had a decent local candidate and/or believed a vote for the nats did not equate to supporting independence. the second is voters who are nationalists because they believed that scottish independence was the most credible route to a more left-wing government. the third is existential nationalists, who support independence for scotland above all else. having spectacularly misjudged the public mood in calling for a second independence referendum, nicola sturgeon drove support in that first category away from her party and towards the conservatives in the magnitude of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands. however, provided that this was the only direction in which the snp were losing support, their grip on scotland looked safe enough. explaining the increase in the labour vote is somewhat more difficult. in what were once labour heartlands there was a palpable shift in anti-snp labour supporters towards the tories, believing ruth davidson to be the most doughty opponent of a second independence referendum. in many working-class seats across scotland the tories more than tripled their vote, and a sizeable chunk of that was from voters who stuck with labour even in 2015. at the same time, having spent much of the past two months canvassing there is at least some anecdotal evidence of disquiet about the snp’s record in government. kenny farquharson also posits that among the younger and more radical voters many now no longer see independence as the only road to a more just society. in any event, it appears that the snp has begun to lose voters within that second category too, which goes some way towards explaining labour’s increase in support despite discernible losses to the tories. which is why the road ahead for nicola sturgeon is more dangerous than ever. no fewer than 30 of the snp’s 35 seats require a swing of less than 5% to fall to another party. the vast majority of these seats face towards labour. nicola sturgeon’s next step is critical. the expectation is that the first minister does as many of her

URL analysis for stuartmaclennan.co.uk

http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/category/uncategorized/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/tag/indyref2/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/#header
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/2017/06/the-road-ahead-for-sturgeon-is-fraught-with-danger/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/category/international-relations/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/page/2/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/tag/snp/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/tag/robert-menendez/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/2017/03/second-time-around-eu-membership-for-scotland-is-more-difficult-not-less/#respond
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/tag/ken-macintosh/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/tag/ian-blackford/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/tag/pauline-mcneill/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/category/scottish-politics/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/category/general/
http://www.stuartmaclennan.co.uk/2017/03/second-time-around-eu-membership-for-scotland-is-more-difficult-not-less/
thetimes.co.uk
login.westlaw.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Error for "stuartmaclennan.co.uk".

the WHOIS query quota for 2600:3c03:0000:0000:f03c:91ff:feae:779d has been exceeded
and will be replenished in 267 seconds

WHOIS lookup made at 10:31:27 17-Aug-2018

--
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:

Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.

You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REFERRER http://www.nominet.org.uk

  REGISTRAR Nominet UK

SERVERS

  SERVER co.uk.whois-servers.net

  ARGS stuartmaclennan.co.uk

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DISCLAIMER
This WHOIS information is provided for free by Nominet UK the central registry
for .uk domain names. This information and the .uk WHOIS are:
Copyright Nominet UK 1996 - 2018.
You may not access the .uk WHOIS or use any data from it except as permitted
by the terms of use available in full at https://www.nominet.uk/whoisterms,
which includes restrictions on: (A) use of the data for advertising, or its
repackaging, recompilation, redistribution or reuse (B) obscuring, removing
or hiding any or all of this notice and (C) exceeding query rate or volume
limits. The data is provided on an 'as-is' basis and may lag behind the
register. Access may be withdrawn or restricted at any time.

  REGISTERED no

DOMAIN

  NAME stuartmaclennan.co.uk

NSERVER

  NS1069.IFASTNET.COM 185.2.168.11

  NS2069.IFASTNET.COM 185.2.168.20

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .